Tax perks demanded by Build To Rent supporters

Tax perks demanded by Build To Rent supporters

The British Property Federation (BPF) has called on the Chancellor to deliver a series of tax reforms, including some specifically to help the troubled Build To Rent sector. 

In a submission to HM Treasury this week, the BPF highlights the annual £110 billion contribution of the real estate industry to the UK economy,  supporting one in 13 of all jobs in the UK, yet argues that this is at risk due to the ongoing viability crisis impacting all asset classes. 

It says this can be evidenced by July’s S&P Global UK Construction Manager’s Index showing the sharpest contraction in activity for five years, the most recent quarterly Build To Rent (BTR) starts showing further decline, and the September 2025 Deloitte London Office Crane Survey recording a decrease in new construction activity for second consecutive survey.

The federation claims the crisis is particularly acute in the BTR sector, with construction starts in the first half of 2025 falling to just 2,600 homes, compared with 18,000 new BTR homes delivered in the whole of 2024. The BPF’s submission highlights where the tax system is undermining the viability of high-density housing developments that are rolled out at pace, such as BTR. 

And it claims the sharp decline in construction of BTR is a significant blow to government ambitions to deliver 1.5m homes this Parliament and fast-track the development of New Towns.

Ahead of the Budget the BPF’s key asks for the Chancellor are:

Reinstate Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) support for high density housing – The abolition of Multiple Dwellings Relief (MDR) under the previous government in 2024 significantly disadvantaged high density housing developed at scale – and has permanently eroded the value of the asset class – particularly in less valuable areas. The BPF estimates that the abolition of MDR last year directly stalled or hampered the delivery of up to 25,000 BtR homes – and are calling for targeted support to be reinstated, to support the delivery of high density housing.

Extend Empty Property Business Rates Relief to 12 months – As it stands property owners are liable to pay business rates on empty commercial properties after three months for retail and office buildings, and six months for larger logistics buildings. This is insufficient – analysis of 1000 retail locations by the BPF found that just 9% of empty shops are re-let in six months – showing how out of step the current relief is with actual reoccupation times. This not only adds to the risk of speculative development – by hampering viability of developments and refurbishments – but actively takes away capital at the very point property owners need to carry out refurbishment and energy efficiency improvement works. BPF analysis shows that 83% of commercial properties in our 7 biggest cities are below EPC B – underlining the urgent need for sustainability improvements to our commercial property stock.

Remove council tax on newly developed BTR homes – Currently new BTR homes are liable for council tax three months after completion, but the letting of larger developments delivering hundreds of much needed homes often takes 12 months or more.  The current system effectively penalises high density housing developments that are built-out quickly – by adding a significant tax cost that wouldn’t occur on low-density schemes which are built out at a slower pace.

Extend zero-VAT for energy saving materials – In order to make the refurbishment of older rented housing stock viable the BPF is calling for all energy saving materials and heating equipment to be zero-VAT rated. As it stands, zero-VAT is only applicable when energy efficient improvements are delivered on a standalone basis rather than as part of a wider refurbishment.

A BPF spokesperson says: “As long-term investors in communities across the country, our members want to harness domestic and global capital to support the delivery of New Towns at pace; and invest in more productive workspaces, new homes for all stages of life, and the buildings and public spaces that underpin modern, cohesive communities. Yet despite welcome moves to reform the planning system, investor sentiment remains fragile, as evidenced by the collapse in construction activity across the UK. There are simply too many layers of regulation, tax and levies on new development which is at odds with the commitment to ‘back the builders’.

“We appreciate the fiscal pressure the government is under, but we urge the Chancellor not to underestimate the cost of inaction – the government will not raise any taxes and levies on development that doesn’t happen. Only by addressing the development viability crisis will the Government unlock the economic growth and investment we need to see across the country.”

This article is taken from Landlord Today